Following the “success” of the implementation of the smoking ban in the UK, the Government has now shifted its focus to the next vice du jour: alcohol. It was only a matter of time.
In a determined move to nanny the state ever more, Home Secretary Alan Johnson today announced that drinks promotions will be banned by his Government in April. Presuming they’re in power, of course.
“Alcohol-related crime costs the UK billions of pounds every year and while the vast majority of retailers are responsible, a minority continue to run irresponsible promotions which fuel the excessive drinking that leads to alcohol-related crime and disorder”
So we need a blanket ban applied to all licensed premises because of this minority, then Johnno? Wouldn’t be the first time Labour punished the majority because of the minority.
“These practices have a real impact on society, not to mention the lives of those who just want to enjoy a good night out.”
Would that be the majority of people that want a good night out and go to the majority of bars/clubs/supermarkets to buy drinks? For fuck’s sake Alan.
In a bizarre U-turn, Gordon Brown agrees;
“we will give local authorities the power to ban 24-hour drinking throughout a community”
The Conservatives want to play this game too and have tossed their two penneth into the ring. In fact, resident slap-head and shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling went one step further in pledging to allow councils power to apply arbitrary taxes on drink sold after a certain time. Call yourself a fucking Conservative you nannying twat. What next, a rule saying you can’t drink alcohol between certain hours?
Dave Daly will be jumping for joy at this news as it takes one step closer to his holy grail of pub profits: the minimum price for alcohol. But as we saw in the days of Al Capone, once you start making alcohol prohibitively expensive people simply start making their own which is usually a lot stronger than alcohol purchased in shops. Drive alcohol into the black market and I think it’s fair to say the Government and police will have a far more serious problem with gang culture than they do with easily controllable drunks on a weekend.
It won’t go that far, though. I’m sure Sir Terry Leahy is sat in his boardroom at Tesco HQ pissing himself laughing at this latest bout of sparring between the leading mainstream parties, because the result of destroying bars and clubs with knee-jerk tax hikes and drinking bans implemented by idiots like Peter Callow mean people will be more likely to purchase booze in the supermarket and stay at home. That’s a sure fire way to create an antisocial society.
Who hasn’t taken advantage of a happy hour or two-for-one promotion? I know I have, and if I were on a night out and saw a promotion I’d probably go and enjoy it. But does that mean we all go round falling over in the street, urinating, attacking police officers and committing vandalism? Well, no.
Is that really the issue they’re trying to address, though? If it is, then it’s easily solved by imposing draconian solutions upon landlords that continue to serve drunk people. How about permanent license revocation? It’s not a new law but it’s rarely enforced: it seems the authorities are more interested in sending teenagers into supermarkets.
Or is it that the Government Knows Best™ and is doing this because it deems that we’re all incapable of deciding for ourselves whether we want to put our bodies through the impact of 12 pints of Stella?
Chris McSlaphead is correct in that Labour has created a binge drinking culture; he blames the 24 hour licensing laws but I disagree. The problem is people, not drinks promotions or licensing hours.
Does Grayling really think that because pubs open for another hour on quiz night we’re showered in an unending oblivion of violence? Is he suggesting that the majority of antisocial behaviour due to drinking occurs because someone bought a drink outside what Dave Daly deems to be traditional drinking hours? Does he not realise that almost nowhere has a 24 hour alcohol license because it’s simply not worth it?
Regardless of the time at which a drink is bought, excess alcohol makes bad people do bad things. It does not make everyone do bad things.
City professionals often go on drinks benders that dwarf those partaken by visitors to Blackpool on a Saturday night, but how many of them are out there committing offences afterwards?
Labour are determined to blame the antisocial society that they have parented on drinks promotions but it’s all down to their neglectful policy. Labour created the ASBO culture by neglecting schools and making it impossible to meaningfully discipline a child: the spawn of Labour’s education system is the origin of the increase in antisocial behaviour in the UK.
They pulverised the education system into a target-driven publicity vehicle at the expense of actual education. People are leaving schools with very little social responsibility, few aspirations and few qualifications of any value.
Labour’s failures have created financial pressure upon a lot of people, too. Under Labour, the cost of basic supplies has skyrocketed. People have lost their investments in places like Bradford and Bingley after Labour did a Railtrack and relieved it of its assets. People have lost their life savings as stock markets collapsed. People have lost their homes. There are about a million more people unemployed since Labour came to power. And now people are signed up to an eternity of tax hikes due to Gordon Brown.
Bloody hell, after all that, I fancy a drink.


Bra-fucking-vo!
Someone’s been reading Devil’s Kitchen of late, haven’t they?
“Any similarities are purely coincidental”
If you like DK, you might also enjoy Mr. Eugenides – http://mreugenides.blogspot.com/
I enjoyed that cougars video, cracked up laughing!
The suggestions are complete crap. I rarely drink (and never get drunk) and even I’ve taken advantage of two for one drinks at happy hour (shared with a friend or family).
The licensing hours need cutting back. This will stop drunks roaming the streets in the early hours waking everyone up. It won’t for one minute stop people getting drunk though.
If you look at the countries with the worst drink problems they’re always ones which have a depressed resident population – Russia and Poland being prime examples. The UK’s obviously in there because we’re becoming a poor nation – maybe not on paper with our wage levels but when you take living costs off, we’re probably about level with these countries. What would drive drinking down most in my personal opinion, is to have more entertainment at affordable price levels, more “socialising without drinkin”g opportunities of any kind so you can have a good night out without being in a pub or club. Unless you’re into floodlit sports or staying at home as a couch potato, what is there to do?
To be honest I’ve never really been bothered by noisy drunks roaming the streets, but I accept it does happen. It’s probably less of an evil than we’re led to believe, though.
You’re right about the UK having a depressed population, but should that perhaps be oppressed? After all, the Government seems intent on living our lives for us and the mainstream are seemingly doing battle on who can be the biggest nanny!
In answer to the last question, well, I’m going to the cinema later and I wont be drinking so that’s one thing! Depends on your definition of affordable I suppose.
I think the simplest answer is to restrict the sale of alcohol from supermarkets. I think there should be much tougher tests in order to obtain a license to sell alcohol and anyone selling it should have a licence. The minimum age should also raised to 21. Draconion measures maybe, but there needs to be some responsibility by those selling alcohol. At the moment, pub landlords are the ones who control (in most cases!) the sale of alcohol on their premises, but a lot of the alcohol related problems are not caused by pub customers.
I don’t think raising the age limit will have any effect at all because there will still be people old enough to buy alcohol for younger people.
After all, the age limit is 18 now but does that mean that kids as young as 10 are not drinking alcohol? Apparently not.
Is under age drinking the problem they’re trying to address, though? Looking at the comments from the prime minister, home secretary and shadow home secretary it appears that it’s just drink fuelled violence, be it vandalism or spouse beating.
They way things are going,we will need to have a licence to PURCHASE alcohol, shit, shouldnt have said that, thats another money spinner!
Jesus Christ DK rants as bad as me!
In the seventies in Fleetwood the fine was £25 for being drunk and disordely in the street. Plus your name and maybe picture was in the paper. This was quite effective, now of course the fine would need to be £250 and video of your dunken behavour on Youtube, but it may be worth a try.
Nobody minds the drinking it is the bad behavour that should be stopped, set up stocks in the street outside the bars if the cells are full.