<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two jobsworths out, plenty more to go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/</link>
	<description>Right-leaning Blackpool blog covering South Shore, North Shore, Marton, Bispham, Cleveleys and the rest of the Fylde discussing politics, local life, tourism, national issues and the rest of the world. Lively discussions encouraged!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talbot Gateway offices will pay for themselves &#8211; over 207 years » Philtheone.com</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-17841</link>
		<dc:creator>Talbot Gateway offices will pay for themselves &#8211; over 207 years » Philtheone.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-17841</guid>
		<description>[...] figure in the grand scheme of the council, particularly when just two former council officers were paid off to the tune of £400,000 last year and particularly when the Fowlers and the Callows have cost the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] figure in the grand scheme of the council, particularly when just two former council officers were paid off to the tune of £400,000 last year and particularly when the Fowlers and the Callows have cost the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two jobsworths out, plenty more to go &#171; Nannystate&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>Two jobsworths out, plenty more to go &#171; Nannystate&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>[...] Two jobsworths out, plenty more to go &#124; Philtheone.com.       Comments RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two jobsworths out, plenty more to go | Philtheone.com.       Comments RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boney</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Boney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>internet law?! had no idea a whole set of made up laws goven the whole internet around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>internet law?! had no idea a whole set of made up laws goven the whole internet around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philtheone</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>Philtheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not an &quot;internet law&quot; though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not an &#8220;internet law&#8221; though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>You cant just opt out of the internet laws unfortunatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cant just opt out of the internet laws unfortunatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesh</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>Lol internet.

If anyone belives that swearing at other people on the internet is illegal, then i seriously suggest that you spend a bit more time on here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol internet.</p>
<p>If anyone belives that swearing at other people on the internet is illegal, then i seriously suggest that you spend a bit more time on here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boney</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>Boney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>A legal disclaimer that has to be &quot;check boxed&quot; by the unregistered poster should do the trick. That and moderation of any post distantly illegal in nature. That’s all you need to show ‘due diligence’ as TrooBloo rightly put it. As Troobloo also noted you don’t want to get owned for ‘inciting hatred’ or the enabling of it via the comments. There is little to no basis on the site for that though as it is. 

Defamatory remarks are by users are ok as long as there based on hard facts or are pure opinion and are stated that way. The law does look at the context of a defamatory remark in court.

If I was to call you a paedophile directly as a statement of fact you might have grounds to sue me.
If I was to like you to a paedophile in an analogy then you probably would not depending on context.

To be honest, I don’t think ya have anything to worry about in my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A legal disclaimer that has to be &#8220;check boxed&#8221; by the unregistered poster should do the trick. That and moderation of any post distantly illegal in nature. That’s all you need to show ‘due diligence’ as TrooBloo rightly put it. As Troobloo also noted you don’t want to get owned for ‘inciting hatred’ or the enabling of it via the comments. There is little to no basis on the site for that though as it is. </p>
<p>Defamatory remarks are by users are ok as long as there based on hard facts or are pure opinion and are stated that way. The law does look at the context of a defamatory remark in court.</p>
<p>If I was to call you a paedophile directly as a statement of fact you might have grounds to sue me.<br />
If I was to like you to a paedophile in an analogy then you probably would not depending on context.</p>
<p>To be honest, I don’t think ya have anything to worry about in my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrooBloo</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>TrooBloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>You are right Phil, re the Gasjet. The way I see it  There are three choices 1. Heavily Moderated - expensive  2. Self  Moderation - we know about those drawbacks  3. No Comments!  This is why when the story is about a particular person or group of people they just turn comments off..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Phil, re the Gasjet. The way I see it  There are three choices 1. Heavily Moderated &#8211; expensive  2. Self  Moderation &#8211; we know about those drawbacks  3. No Comments!  This is why when the story is about a particular person or group of people they just turn comments off..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philtheone</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3156</link>
		<dc:creator>Philtheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3156</guid>
		<description>Why do you think that, Paul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think that, Paul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Paul</title>
		<link>http://philtheone.com/2010/01/two-jobsworths-out-plenty-more-to-go/#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philtheone.com/?p=1459#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>I’m not been funny pal, but it is about time you had your wings clipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not been funny pal, but it is about time you had your wings clipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

