10 years ago, if you asked me if I would ever vote for the British National Party, I would have cracked up laughing amongst a stream of expletives in retort; but how the times change, along with my own views.
10 years on, and still under a Labour government, I have seen and become aware of changes that I was never consulted about, nor did I wish to see. I have discovered the conservative and the nationalist within me, and it’s all down to Nulabour.
It’s a question of age and life experience really. At 41 I have learned to appreciate a number of aspects of British life and I see them threatened and I wish to preserve them. When I say conservative, I mean the desire to preserve; retain that I consider valuable and good about our country, not the so called conservative party who are in my view no longer conservative. So here are my reasons for voting BNP.
1) Multiculturalism: An ideology that postulates that all cultures are equal. Really? So if a culture arrives that encourages sex with children, do we then treat it as an equal and say ok? Like hell we don’t! I know this is an extreme example but the idea of a multi-cultural society implies a society based upon multiple legal systems, languages and so on. It’s a no go, as Professor Roger Scruton observed, it’s a recipe for anarchy. No surprise then that we have parts of this country that want to implement their own law and are separatist in their outlook. Even the fanatical Marxist, Commissar Trevor Phillips has decreed that the term should be dropped as it implies separation. Well it has done just that, split the nation and put it on a road towards a situation not unlike the Balkans. You have been warned.
2) Political Correctness: the corruption or rational thought, supplanted by the emotional appeal of an argument. This ideology is surely the perversion of western society and from an ideological perspective, its greatest threat as it’s the enemy within. Straight from the Frankfurt school the PC brigade have a hatred of normal white Christian males; whom they regard as oppressors. If there is no problem, then the PC brigade create one to justify their PC laws which are based upon fear and are used to silence reasoned debate through verbal repression, and labour is the party of PC, although Cameron suffers from the same psychosis.
3) To quote Judge John Roberts in a case where African Americans overturned a policy of positive discrimination, he said, “If you want to stop discrimination, stop discriminating”. Harriet Harman take note!!! I suspect Martin Luther King would be turning in his grave at what is happening today, all he asked for was to be judged on the content of ones character and not colour, a request that has fallen on deaf ears where the PC brigade is concerned.
4) Welfare-ism: Something for nothing is Labours de facto policy and the evidence is clear: The Politts, McGrawleys and the multitudinous Yusufs are living proof of a freedom without responsibility. It’s quite simple really, if you are on benefit and decide to have more kids, tough. What was meant as a safety net, has under Labour’s idea of socialism transmogrified into a hammock for certain sectors of society and it must be stopped. This culture eats away at the bottom of society producing a burgeoning Jeremy Kyle underclass bereft of the work ethic. Little surprise then, that we have to rely on immigrants to do certain jobs, jobs these parasites should be doing. Personally I hate spongers like Adolf Hitler hated Jews; it’s a shame I can’t do what he did, because believe me I would and with archetypal ruthless Teutonic efficiency: extirpate them all.
5) Mass immigration: Bring in the 3rd world and that’s what you get: the 3rd world. Why an island this small and densely populated (England the 4th most) needs such large levels of immigration is beyond me; you don’t see Japan doing it, do you? Why we never had a system like Australia defies belief. But to mention immigration without the welfare state is an incomplete analysis as I believe the 2 are closely linked, as made in point 3. Most immigrants work but they add to the population which increases the demand for housing, resources, NHS, pensions, etc. On an island like this and without proper control it’s a recipe for trouble and it’s already started. A recent committee headed by Frank Field and Nicholas Sommes has said that all 3 parties are in denial on the issue. No surprise there. Those that the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.
6) Law and order: the recent furore about Bulger killer Jon Venables aptly sums up the sick, obscene and sorry state of affairs we have in the UK. The victim here is Jon Venables, forget about Jamie Bulger, his rights don’t matter, forget about the public, they don’t matter, no lets spend a fortune protecting a vile degenerate killer. Someone breaks into your house? Fine, if you defend yourself, you have made the burglar the victim and you go to prison for infringing his human rights to rob and attack you with impunity. Law and order under Labour? It’s out of order!
7) The EUSSR. Its time a whole new look at the relationship between the UK and the EU was taken, at this rate we may as well do away with the nation state and subordinate to the Brussels mafia, who according to UKIP make 75% of our laws. Europe is a fantastic continent, rich in culture and heritage but the EU threatens that. We have already ended one cold war with a super state to find ourselves under the power of another. Thanks but no thanks, love Europe, hate the EU.
Yes, I will be voting for James Clayton, but before anyone starts calling him Nazi and fascist, just remember this fact. He’s a young man, highly intelligent, well spoken and only 22; instead of standing on street corners swigging Tennents Super and abusing old folk, he’s got the guts to stand up for something he believes in. He would have an easier ride joining the Labour or “Conservative” party, but he’s sticking his neck out and that takes courage; something that is absent in today’s convictonless MPs.
How many youngsters aged 22 do you know of, who do that? Not many.
loading…
Respectfully….
you haven’t given seven reasons for voting for the BNP. You haven’t even managed one. You’ve just lifted seven rent-a-grumbles, without context, most of which could’ve been picked out by anyone at any time since the war. I hope you can help me get a real picture of why you’re planning to vote BNP by answering the following questions;
1) You say that you have a problem with the idea that all cultures should be treated equally, then make up a fictional example of a culture that should be treated less equally. Give us some real life examples of ‘lesser’ cultures. You say ‘we have parts of this country that want to implement their own law and are separatist in their outlook’ – do you mean Scotland and Wales? If not, please give examples. You say Britain is on the roadf to ‘Balkanization’ [sic] – do you believe electing a far-right party like the BNP would make this more, or less likely? Please explain what the BNP will do about ‘multiculturalism’
2) I agree that the use of politically correct language is deeply irritating, but please give an example of a ‘PC law’? Again, what would the BNP do about any of this
3) Struggling to see what this means. Please give examples of what you consider to be ‘discrimination’ and, given point one, please tell us how treating different cultures in a different way will mean less ‘discrimination’ and what the BNP will do about this
4) Most people would agree about the problems of welfare dependence. But kindly tell us what, short of mass execution, the BNP intends to do about this, and tell us why, when Conservative and Labour governments have promised to stamp out this culture, only to see it burgeos, you believe the BNP’s policies will succeed?
5) Please explain what Australia’s ‘policy’ is and why it’s good. Is Australia not a country of immigrants, or are you referring to the policies of the aborigines, which seem to have failed to prevent an influx of millions of white Europeans. Also, with non-skilled immigration from outside the EU already banned, except in sectors with severe labour shortages, what more will the BNP do? What will the BNP’s attitude be to Britons who choose to make their life outside the UK?
6) Please give an example, besides the murdering farmer, of a person being convicted for defending themselves or their property against a burglar. Please explain what the BNP would’ve done about the Bulger killer, and about this issue in general
7) What would the BNP do about this and, in particular, where does the BNP’s policy differ from that of UKIP?
loading...
Give us some real life examples of ‘lesser’ cultures.
I would suggest that cultures can be judged by the values they share – whether they be the culture of the BNP, the USSR or post-Enlightenment Europe.
It’s dangerous to assert that all cultures are equal. There are some that we aspire towards and others that we fear, rightly or wrongly. To demand ‘respect’ for cultures, though, is to brush off the right to be critical and outspoken on them. Worse than that, it shows just how ill thought out the ‘respect’ agenda is, if it’s to be a rational and fair one.
As for the BNP’s ‘political correctness’ stance… They won’t simply nullify ‘equality’ legislation – they’ll put it in to a hard reverse and serve up their own idea of what is correct politically. Don’t imagine for a moment that Britain will achieve true equality for all its citizens. Like at present, some will be more equal than others, through absolutely no fault of their own – although I could imagine that people would have to live their lives a lot more ‘privately’, lest they suffer genuine discrimination.
None of this however, is a concern for lots of BNP voters. I’m sure they’re more than aware that the BNP harbours people who live beyond the pale with some extraordinarily degenerated views. But their agenda speaks to something much broader, which has obviously sparked support in fairly ordinary people.
There’s something very, very wrong with our system when a sizeable chunk of the electorate has been handed over to a bunch of national socialists (who aren’t averse to cashing in on the taxpayer either)
loading...
Mr Osato, heres proof that by voting BNP it forces the mainstream effete to start doing something about an issue that they would rather ignore:immigration.
Labours policy ,like the party itself is a farce.They havent cottoned on to the population incraese caused by immigration.
what amuses me is how they go on about parties that are hostile to immigrants, we have a prty in power thats hostile to those already living here.Fuck this wanker Brown,roll on the election and roll on BNP seats.This is what happens when you ignore reasonable pleas by reasonable people, they vote for parties like the BNP.Some grumble eh, Mr OSATO, or should I say reason?
loading...
Hi ,I have given my 7 reasons, there were plenty more.Take them or leave them its your choice.You presume that the BNP have all the answers, they dont.But these are issues that the mainstream have ignored and are continuing to do so.They needa wake up call,hence my reasons for voting BNP,its a protest at the current state of affairs due to ostrich politics.
If the mainstream did start to take these issues more seriously, I wouldnt feel the need to vote BNP.The tories are no longer conservative,all of these issues at one time would have been their natural ground, but under DC hes adopted PC.
I know plenty of people who feel like me and will be voting or have voted BNP.I dont and wont try and convince you Mr Osato,its pointless
Of course Mr Osato, keep voting labour and assume all is fine in fairyland but these issues wont go away, they will get bigger.Politics is like business, if you dont deal with customers concerns, somebody else will, the BNP.
loading...
I haven’t voted Labour since ’97, so guess again.
And I still don’t see ‘seven reasons for voting for the BNP’ anywhere in your posts, just seven vaguely defined bugbears. Why will any of these things get better if the BNP get in? Have elected BNP representatives made any difference whatsoever on any of these issues?
loading...
Mr O, please read.
“So here are MY reasons for voting BNP”
These are my reasons,I am explaining why I choose to vote for a party,its NOT an injunction or reccomendation to vote BNP in general.Call it a tactical protest vote.
What you consider as not a reason, may be a reason to someone else;thats politics for you.
Have elected BNP representatives made any difference whatsoever on any of these issues?
Nope, there arent any BNP MPs in parliament (yet)
Why will any of these things get better if the BNP get in?
Noone can predict the future so who knows,but if BNP Mps get in,it would force the mainstream to acknowledge that there are concerns that need to be addressed.
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/566088/Shock-poll-shows-majority-share-BNP-views-on-immigrants.html
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/566088/Shock-poll-shows-majority-share-BNP-views-on-immigrants.html
loading...
Right, now we’re getting to the nub of it. You’re voting for the BNP as a ‘tactical protest vote’ – all well and good and ‘its NOT an injunction or reccomendation to vote BNP in general’.
So you wouldn’t reccomend voting for the BNP? You’ll do it, but you don’t want others to? If you do reccomend that others vote for the BNP, why? What will they actually do in power? What have the many BNP candidates voted into power on local councils actually achieved as councillors?
loading...
Mr osatao, who you vote for is up to you,simple as.
I am not recommending that people vote BNP or telling to NOT vote BNP,I just gave my account as to why I will vote BNP.
Are we clear now? are you sure?
READ THIS: So here are my reasons for voting BNP
Finally?
Jesus christ.
loading...
Heres another reason why I will vote BNP,remember Mr Osato I am not saying you should vote or not vote BNP.
Its your choice.
“In real life we don’t choose between good and bad,But between two evils”
George Orwell
Its a shame Islam doesn’t give a damn about the equality of all human beings.(women and KUFIRS) In fact Islam is devoted to the inequality of non-Muslims.How else could it survive,and still remain the ‘moderate’ Islam that we are all so familiar with?
Which now that I come to think about it,is most probably the reason that we won’t “survive”, if we allow this political ideology dressed up as a faith, a religion bearing hallmarks of fascism and marxism to get a foothold in this country.
Why you may ask?
Because Labour are so infatuated with your “equality of all human beings” ideology that those who don’t believe in the equality of all human beings,i.e. “Islam”-must be treated with equal status to the ones that do “us”.
Now there’s a conundrum for you if there were ever one.
The west has become hostage to its own neurotic pathalogical narrative on account of its subordination to political correctness and has got istelf in a mess on this one.
loading...
I think Mr. O has a good point! well actually, 7 of them. I do understand the frustrations of many people who passionately dislike Labour and who feel that the Conservative Party have let them down. If someone genuinely believes that the BNP best represent their views then it is perfectly right and proper that they vote for them. However, if they are voting BNP as a knee jerk protest then they are sending us down a slippery slope. It gives encouragement to the rascists and does nothing whatsoever to change the status quo of the Lab/Con governments.
A change in the voting system is the only way in which we are going to bring even a little democracy to our system. A Conservative victory will do nothing to promote democracy in our country and will see very little change policy wise. However, a hung parliament or even a slender Labour victory could very well see us adopting some form of proportional representation over the next parliament. This is why I cannot possibly support the Conservatives at this time!
loading...
Fair point troobloo,we have been and are still being let down by both parties!
loading...
This is down to Nulabour and the tories have failed to make capital out of it imho.
Andrew Neather, a former speechwriter/adviser for Tony Blair etc has that from 2000 the Labour government secretly pursued a deliberate policy of immigration to make Britain more multicultural.
when did we have a refererendum to decide this???
article here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html
loading...
I disagree with multi-culturalism and originating from an area of Blackburn that is now more akin to Pakistan than England I think I have more real idea what this ideolody leads to.
Firstly there is nothing wrong with being Muslim – it’s a religion that doesn’t promote inequality Harold – and mostly Muslims are muslims just because their parents were.
However there’s everything wrong with allowing Pakistanis to move into this country and not integrate which multi-culturalism entails. The culture leads to the poor treatment and isolation of women. The culture leads to marriages with spouses matched from the ancestral village back home. The culture leads to families of at least 6 children being the norm where the children bring up each other. The culture leads to the education of women being thought as pointless and where imported adult women can rarely speak English. The culture is one where corruption is almost as rife as in our poiltical ruling class – where an unelected “community leader” (male of course) speaks for all whether they want him to or not. Where in polling stations non-English speaking wives used to be shown where to put their cross by their husbands whilst polling staff tried to stop them, now there is at home voting so that the husbands often get two votes.
The politically correct census then decides that these people are disadvantaged and ought to be allowed more in the way of a voice and job opportunities in the public sector despite their lack of qualifications than white English people (unless those white English are politically connected of course ).
You know I don’t even care if these cultures are equal to our own or not – that’s not my judgement to make. What I do care is that an alien culture is expanding extremely rapidly without integration to our own and in certain areas dominating what happens. At a C of E primary school in Blackburn that I used to go to, they now rock with muslim chants instead of prayers – I agree with making prayers not against their religious beliefs but turning the tables completely is not acceptable even if that school (and most of the area) is now 100% muslim.
If you want to live a Pakistani cultural life I believe you should do so in Pakistan. When you look at every country that had rapid integration of different cultures you see bloodshed and strife regardless of what those cultures and religions were – look at Sri Lanka, look at Nigeria, look at the Balkans, Northern Ireland and so on. Multi-cuturalism is a terrible idea. And no party other than the BNP really wants to do something about that, and now that they don’t have the policy of all non-whites “home” (as it’s not practical) there are less and less reasons to avoid voting for them.
loading...
well said Frustrated!
loading...
It’s hard to disagree with many of their ideas and aspirations, but they’re just too inward looking, and full of neanderthals for me.
Their – almost – respectable public facade I’m quite sure hides rather a lot of nastiness and I can only see them doing more harm than good.
That said I expect their share of the vote this time round is going to be significantly higher than it was in 2005, and if that isn’t one of the most damning indictments of Labour’s tenure then I dont know what is.
loading...
I agree entirely JR, mainstream failure = BNP success.
loading...